Posted by ProgExMo
Last month, I was engaged in yet another Facebook debate — this time with an old work colleague of mine, who’s non-LDS. It turned out to be a great example of the kind of debate in which I wish I could engage my family and close friends, since I found it to be both intellectually challenging and amicable. Unfortunately these days, my family and friends rarely engage me in anything other than idle chit-chat, fearing that I’ll bring something up that will make them “uncomfortable”; but I digress.
The debate started off discussing whether irrationality and/or superstition is a requirement to do others harm; branched into a debate on whether Hitler was a theist or not; then came to a comparison of definitions of religion & other philosophies.
With permission from the other parties, I have decided to include the entire debate below; I hope you find it as interesting as I did.
[Note: due to Facebook’s limited abilities, I’ve taken the liberty of re-formatting the text of the debate for my blog. I’ve modified paragraph & line breaks, fixed typos, added emphasis, etc. Other than this, the debate remains unedited in terms of content. I’ve also colour-coded each speaker to make it easier to follow the conversation: I (Tom) am red, Travis is blue, and Jason is green.]
Tags: Anti-Religionist, anti-theism, Antitheism, Apologetics, Argument, Aristoteliansim, Atheism, Atheist, Beliefs, Buddhism, Christopher Hitchens, Confuciansim, Debate, Definitions, Facebook, Fallacy, God, Good vs Evil, Hitler, Humanism, Jainism, Justification, Metaphysical, Muslim, Nazi, Philosophy, Rationality, religion, Richard Dawkins, Secular Humanism, Shinto, Social Constructionism, Supernatural, Superstition, Theism, theist, understanding